Prior to 2nd WGLC draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct was split into 3 drafts:
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct - CT
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6- CT support for SRv6
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr - RR in forward path - issue and fixes
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-26 shepherd report
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6 shepherd report
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr - report pending
WG Call's Initial thread
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Ud2coGDvdXYy7x-SHPSK2Onwjx4/
Consensus decision: Ready for Publication -
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/oNY5gAcE21y1bke6tBzeb76uVo4/
RTG-DIR Early Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-18 - by Jonathan Hardwick - has nits mail message
OPS-DIR Early Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-19- By Bo Wu has nits mail message
Chair's instructions to SEC-DIR reviewer: Intent (Color) could have security issues in this draft. The service data (customer data) is being tracked by intent and placed over service quality tunnels. In one view, it is just more layering. In an alternate view, the color exposes some abstract qualities of the network.
SEC-DIR Early Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-19 - by Magnus Nystrom - did not resolve -18 review issues with 6 issues
see github issue #69 Magnus mail message for-19
Chair's instructions to TSV-DIR: Please look at this draft from the viewpoint of having intent (color) aware customer traffic forwarded over a VPN overlay (tunnels) that forwarded over a set of intent (color) aware underlay of tunnels. Please consider the problems with tunnels in your review of this text.
TSV-DIR Early Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-19 - not completed yet.
[draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-27] - check request sent to IANA
[draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6-04] - check request sent to IANA
SEC-DIR instructions from shepherd:
Intent (Color) could have security issues in this draft. The service data (customer data) is being tracked by intent and placed over service quality tunnels. In one view, it is just more layering. In an alternate view, the color exposes some abstract qualities about the network.
TSV-DIR instructions from shepherd:
Please look at this draft from the viewpoint of having intent (color) aware customer traffic forwarded over a VPN overlay (tunnels) that forwarded over a set of intent (color) aware underlay of tunnels. Please consider the problems with tunnels in your review of this text.
version: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-09.txt
WG Call's Initial Call mail thread
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/KYZbOsg2y4jcOfjV31pee5uhMjQ/
Mai Message Extending of 1st WG LC to 7/28:
Mail Message Extending to 1st WG LC to 8/1:
Early review of -09 by Mohamed Boucadair - has issues. Most of the issues taken care before 1st WG LC. One remaining issue is section 6's text for the reserved bits.
Early Review -12 by Bo Wu - status has issues:
OPS-DIR had four concerns:
a. An operations and manageability section needs to be added
b. Section 10 application to Network Slicing: This section to refer to specific sections of the TEAS-NS functions that were not yet agreed upon.
c. Section 11 SRv6 and Section 13.4 Applicability to IPv6: Recommend combining these two sections.
d. The following things regarding communities need explantion
Early Review of -18 by Magnus - has issues - mail-link - no resolution on link or -19 review.
2 implementations of all features.
(TBD)