Report created by Ketan Talaulikar (ketant@…)
Core Functionality | section | Cisco IOS-XR | Arista EOS | Juniper | Huawei VRP | Nokia SROS | GoBGP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGP SR Policy SAFI base support | 2-4 | 6.5.1 | 4.21.0 | TBD | V800R019C10 | 16.0.R1 | v2.34.0 |
Support for originating SR Policy | 2-4 | 6.5.1 | --- | TBD | --- | 16.0.R1 | v2.34.0 |
Support for using SR Policy as headend | 2-4 | 6.5.1 | 4.21.0 | TBD | V800R019C10 | 16.0.R1 | TBD |
Error handling | 5 | --- | 4.21.0 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
TLV Code Point | Description | Cisco IOS-XR | Arista EOS | Huawei VRP | Nokia SROS | GoBGP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12 | Preference sub-TLV | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
13 | Binding SID sub-TLV | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
14 | ENLP sub-TLV | --- | Yes (4.22.2) | --- | --- | --- |
15 | Priority sub-TLV | --- | --- | --- | --- | Yes |
20 | SRv6 Binding SID | --- | --- | Yes | Yes | --- |
128 | Segment List sub-TLV | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Segment sub-TLVs | sub-TLV 1 | sub-TLV 1 | Sub-TLV 1,13 | Sub-TLV 1 | Yes |
TLV Code Point | Segement Sub TLV | Cisco IOS-XR | Arista EOS | Huawei VRP | Nokia SROS | GoBGP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9 | Weight sub-TLV | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
129 | Policy Candidate Path Name sub-TLV | --- | --- | --- | --- | Yes |
130 | Policy Name sub-TLV | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Sub-TLV | Segment type Description | Cisco IOS-XR | Arista EOS | Huawei VRP | Nokia SR OS | GoBGP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | SR-MPLS Label | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
B | SRv6 SID | --- | --- | Yes | Yes | --- |
Functionality | Cisco IOS-XR | Huawei VRP | Arista EOS | Nokia SR OS | GoBGP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support for Type 0 (default) mode | 7.3.2 | V800R019C10 | 4.21.0 | 16.0.R1 | v2.34.0 |
Support for Type 1 mode | 7.3.2 | --- | 4.21.0 | 16.0.R1 | TBD |
Support for Type 2 mode | --- | --- | 4.21.0 | 16.0.R1 | TBD |
Support for multiple Color Ext Comm | 7.3.2 | V800R019C10 (N1) | 4.21.0 | 16.0.R1 | TBD |
N1(Note 1): The Huawei VRP implementation uses the (Use the Color EC with the largest value).
Interoperability tests between various vendors for this specification has been tested by EANTC for several years now. Specifically, please refer to this test report from the 2019 event
ENACTC test report.
Additional tests were done in similar events in 2020 and 2022.
The interoperability tests do not cover the error conditions or the handing of malformed/invalid BGP
UPDATE messages.